Search & Find
Sitemap | Privacy Policy
FIDIS (Future of Identity in the Information Society)
  • Home
  • About FIDIS
  • FIDIS Interactive
  • Press & Events
  • Resources
  • IDIS Journal
  • Publications
  • Services
  • Privacy Policy
You are here: Resources > FIDIS Deliverables > Profiling > D7.4: Implications of profiling practices on democracy > 

Resources

  • Identity Use Cases & Scenarios.
  • FIDIS Deliverables.
    • Identity of Identity.
    • Interoperability.
    • Profiling.
      • D7.2: Descriptive analysis and inventory of profiling practices.
      • D7.3: Report on Actual and Possible Profiling Techniques in the Field of Ambient Intelligence.
      • D7.4: Implications of profiling practices on democracy.
      • D7.6 Workshop on AmI, Profiling and RFID.
      • D7.7: RFID, Profiling, and AmI.
      • D7.8: Workshop on Ambient Law.
      • D7.9: A Vision of Ambient Law.
      • D7.10: Multidisciplinary literature selection, with Wiki discussion forum on Profiling, AmI, RFID, Biometrics and Identity.
      • D7.11: Kick-off Workshop on biometric behavioural profiling and Transparency Enhancing Technologies.
    • Forensic Implications.
    • HighTechID.
    • Privacy and legal-social content.
    • Mobility and Identity.
    • Other.
  • IDIS Journal.
  • FIDIS Interactive.
  • Press & Events.
  • In-House Journal.
  • Booklets
  • Identity in a Networked World.
  • Identity R/Evolution.

D7.4: Implications of profiling practices on democracy

Counter-profiling by ‘weak’ parties  Title:
CONCLUSIONS
 Introduction

 

Conclusions

Serge Gutwirth and Mireille Hildebrandt 

 

Counter-profiling by ‘weak’ parties  fidis-wp7-del7.4.implication_profiling_practices_03.sxw  Introduction
Denis Royer 37 / 45
 
FIDIS receives research funding from the EU's 6th Framework Programme