Resources
Identity Use Cases & Scenarios.- FIDIS Deliverables.
- Identity of Identity.
- Interoperability.
- Profiling.
- D7.2: Descriptive analysis and inventory of profiling practices.
- D7.3: Report on Actual and Possible Profiling Techniques in the Field of Ambient Intelligence.
- D7.4: Implications of profiling practices on democracy.
- D7.6 Workshop on AmI, Profiling and RFID.
- D7.7: RFID, Profiling, and AmI.
- D7.8: Workshop on Ambient Law.
- D7.9: A Vision of Ambient Law.
- D7.10: Multidisciplinary literature selection, with Wiki discussion forum on Profiling, AmI, RFID, Biometrics and Identity.
- D7.11: Kick-off Workshop on biometric behavioural profiling and Transparency Enhancing Technologies.
- Forensic Implications.
- HighTechID.
- Privacy and legal-social content.
- Mobility and Identity.
- Other.
- IDIS Journal.
- FIDIS Interactive.
- Press & Events.
- In-House Journal.
- Booklets
- Identity in a Networked World.
- Identity R/Evolution.
D7.4: Implications of profiling practices on democracy
 |
Title: REPLY BERT-JAAP KOOPS |
 |
Having read and reviewed the previous texts, which I found intellectually very stimulating, I am stuck with the feeling that these texts raise major issues but ultimately do not really get to the point. I therefore take the liberty of writing a separate reply in which I can act as the devil’s advocate, to argue where I feel that the authors take a wrong turn and where I feel that the discussion ought to be heading. For the sake of argument – to gain the most contrast with the previous texts – this reply tries to be succinct and provocative, and, at times, exaggerating.
| |
   |
|
| Denis Royer | 31 / 45 |
