Resources
- Identity Use Cases & Scenarios.
- FIDIS Deliverables.
- Identity of Identity.
- Interoperability.
- Profiling.
- D7.2: Descriptive analysis and inventory of profiling practices.
- D7.3: Report on Actual and Possible Profiling Techniques in the Field of Ambient Intelligence.
- D7.4: Implications of profiling practices on democracy.
- D7.6 Workshop on AmI, Profiling and RFID.
- D7.7: RFID, Profiling, and AmI.
- D7.8: Workshop on Ambient Law.
- D7.9: A Vision of Ambient Law.
- D7.10: Multidisciplinary literature selection, with Wiki discussion forum on Profiling, AmI, RFID, Biometrics and Identity.
- D7.11: Kick-off Workshop on biometric behavioural profiling and Transparency Enhancing Technologies.
- Forensic Implications.
- HighTechID.
- Privacy and legal-social content.
- Mobility and Identity.
- Other.
- IDIS Journal.
- FIDIS Interactive.
- Press & Events.
- In-House Journal.
- Booklets
- Identity in a Networked World.
- Identity R/Evolution.
D7.4: Implications of profiling practices on democracy
Reply Martin Meints (ICPP):
Introduction
The perspective of this reply differs from the perspective of the initial articles: It represents the personal opinion of a technically educated citizen with experience in IT project management in the public as well as in the private sector. The author currently works in the office of a privacy commissioner in Germany where the application of profiling in the public and private sector and the corresponding application of privacy protection laws are a practical aspect of everyday work.
In consideration of the articles by S. Gutwirth/P. de Hert and Mireille Hildebrandt, firstly I give my opinion on the applicability of data protection law on profiling and on possible limitations. Additionally I point out a few application scenarios where profiling plays a major role today or may do so in the future. The findings are summarised in the conclusion.
Denis Royer | 23 / 45 |