Resources
Identity Use Cases & Scenarios.
FIDIS Deliverables.
Identity of Identity.
Interoperability.
Profiling.
D7.2: Descriptive analysis and inventory of profiling practices.
D7.3: Report on Actual and Possible Profiling Techniques in the Field of Ambient Intelligence.
D7.4: Implications of profiling practices on democracy.
D7.6 Workshop on AmI, Profiling and RFID.
D7.7: RFID, Profiling, and AmI.
D7.8: Workshop on Ambient Law.
D7.9: A Vision of Ambient Law.
D7.10: Multidisciplinary literature selection, with Wiki discussion forum on Profiling, AmI, RFID, Biometrics and Identity.
D7.11: Kick-off Workshop on biometric behavioural profiling and Transparency Enhancing Technologies.
Forensic Implications.
HighTechID.
Privacy and legal-social content.
Mobility and Identity.
Other.
IDIS Journal.
FIDIS Interactive.
Press & Events.
In-House Journal.
Booklets
Identity in a Networked World.
Identity R/Evolution.
Any processing of personal data must be lawful and fair to the individuals concerned (article 6.1.a). This fairness principle is abstract and difficult to evaluate. In legal theory we refer to the ‘abstractness’ of this kind of principles as ‘open texture’, indicating the impossibility and undesirability of rigid and detailed articulation of concepts and principles that anticipate a host of indeterminate future events. The question is not whether group or individual profiling as such infringes the fairness principle. A lot will depend on the particular context of each case and on the checks and balances built into the actual practice, that should allow stakeholders (like the data subjects) enough bargaining power within the process of collecting and processing of personal data.
30 / 62 |