Resources
Identity Use Cases & Scenarios.
FIDIS Deliverables.
Identity of Identity.
Interoperability.
Profiling.
Forensic Implications.
HighTechID.
D3.1: Overview on IMS.
D3.2: A study on PKI and biometrics.
D3.3: Study on Mobile Identity Management.
D3.5: Workshop on ID-Documents.
D3.6: Study on ID Documents.
D3.7: A Structured Collection on RFID Literature.
D3.8: Study on protocols with respect to identity and identification – an insight on network protocols and privacy-aware communication.
D3.9: Study on the Impact of Trusted Computing on Identity and Identity Management.
D3.10: Biometrics in identity management.
D3.11: Report on the Maintenance of the IMS Database.
D3.15: Report on the Maintenance of the ISM Database.
D3.17: Identity Management Systems – recent developments.
D12.1: Integrated Workshop on Emerging AmI Technologies.
D12.2: Study on Emerging AmI Technologies.
D12.3: A Holistic Privacy Framework for RFID Applications.
D12.4: Integrated Workshop on Emerging AmI.
D12.5: Use cases and scenarios of emerging technologies.
D12.6: A Study on ICT Implants.
D12.7: Identity-related Crime in Europe – Big Problem or Big Hype?.
D12.10: Normality Mining: Results from a Tracking Study.
Privacy and legal-social content.
Mobility and Identity.
Other.
IDIS Journal.
FIDIS Interactive.
Press & Events.
In-House Journal.
Booklets
Identity in a Networked World.
Identity R/Evolution.
D3.6: Study on ID Documents
Electronic Signatures
A basic introduction of the European Directive 99/93/EU on electronic signatures, the technology and cryptography behind electronic signatures and possible privacy and security problems are given in the FIDIS Deliverable 3.2 “Study on PKI and Biometrics” (Gasson, Meints, Warwick 2005) in chapter 3.
An important aspect is that although based on the European Directive 99/93/EU the implementation of electronic signatures in Europe shows a large variety. So far no consensus has been reached as to which technological implementation can be used to reach one of four levels of electronic signatures (simple, advanced, qualified and accredited signatures) as defined in the European Electronic Signature Directive. In addition there is no consensus, for which kind of administrative procedures what kind of signature is needed.
Many European Countries have introduced signature schemes that do not necessarily need a smart card and a type III card reader (for example Lithuania, Austria, Finland). In these cases alternatively the signing procedure can be carried out using a mobile phone or even a USB stick (for example in Austria). In these cases we speak of a procedural signature solution. These signature solutions are not restricted to ID documents. Other countries such as Belgium and Germany tend to use signature cards and type III card readers for electronic signing in most e-government processes. In these cases we speak of a card-bound signature solution.
Denis Royer | 9 / 56 |