Resources
Identity Use Cases & Scenarios.- FIDIS Deliverables.
- Identity of Identity.
- Interoperability.
- Profiling.
- Forensic Implications.
- HighTechID.
- D3.1: Overview on IMS.
- D3.2: A study on PKI and biometrics.
- D3.3: Study on Mobile Identity Management.
- D3.5: Workshop on ID-Documents.
- D3.6: Study on ID Documents.
- D3.7: A Structured Collection on RFID Literature.
- D3.8: Study on protocols with respect to identity and identification – an insight on network protocols and privacy-aware communication.
- D3.9: Study on the Impact of Trusted Computing on Identity and Identity Management.
- D3.10: Biometrics in identity management.
- D3.11: Report on the Maintenance of the IMS Database.
- D3.15: Report on the Maintenance of the ISM Database.
- D3.17: Identity Management Systems – recent developments.
- D12.1: Integrated Workshop on Emerging AmI Technologies.
- D12.2: Study on Emerging AmI Technologies.
- D12.3: A Holistic Privacy Framework for RFID Applications.
- D12.4: Integrated Workshop on Emerging AmI.
- D12.5: Use cases and scenarios of emerging technologies.
- D12.6: A Study on ICT Implants.
- D12.7: Identity-related Crime in Europe – Big Problem or Big Hype?.
- D12.10: Normality Mining: Results from a Tracking Study.
- Privacy and legal-social content.
- Mobility and Identity.
- Other.
- IDIS Journal.
- FIDIS Interactive.
- Press & Events.
- In-House Journal.
- Booklets
- Identity in a Networked World.
- Identity R/Evolution.
 |
Untitled CONCLUSIONS |
 |
Conclusions
This workshop had three core objectives:
To organise the content of D12.6 “Study on ICT Implants” by discussion of the initial contributions and co-ordination of the partners
To ensure adequate range and scope of the content of D12.5 “Use cases and scenarios of emerging technologies” by evaluating and discussing the initial contributions
To update schedules of the two deliverables based on the editor’s comments and the further contributions required from the participants
These objectives were achieved, with follow-up discussions planned to be held on the dedicated deliverable mailing lists. The approach of having first contributions before the workshop, as opposed to vice-versa, which is more common in FIDIS, worked very well and fostered very fruitful discussion and debate. This will certainly be a model adopted in the future.
The inter-disciplinary nature of the NoE always ensures that in any case such events are broad in their scope, and this led to a great deal of discussion. As is nearly always the true, time for discussion was shorter than preferred and, ideally, subsequent events will somehow cater for extended discussion sessions where possible. However, in this case the aim was to keep the contributors workshop to within one day.
A proposal for the development of both deliverables was presented by the respective chapter editors and was discussed and amended during the workshop by all partners involved. In addition, time planning for contribution delivery was discussed, and the revised time plans were drawn up (see Annex 3).
An additional result from the discussion sessions was the proposal of a further deliverable which extends the work being undertaken. Such developments are very important for the continued excellent work beyond the time frame of the FIDIS NoE, and are a true reflection of the value of providing a face-to-face forum where issues can be openly discussed and debated in an inter-disciplinary context.
Overall, feedback on the event from the participants was excellent and progress on the subsequent deliverables is now moving forward in a timely manner.
| |
   |
|
| 6 / 9 |
