Resources
- Identity Use Cases & Scenarios.
- FIDIS Deliverables.
- Identity of Identity.
- Interoperability.
- Profiling.
- Forensic Implications.
- D5.1: A survey on legislation on ID theft in the EU and….
- D5.2: ID Fraud Workshop.
- D5.2b: ID-related Crime: Towards a Common Ground for Interdisciplinary Research.
- D5.2c: Identity related crime in the world of films.
- D5.3: A Multidisciplinary Article on Identity-related Crime.
- D5.4: Anonymity in electronic government: a case-study analysis of governments? identity knowledge.
- D6.1: Forensic Implications of Identity Management Systems.
- D6.5/D6.6: Second thematic Workshop forensic implications.
- D6.7b: Workshop on Forensic Profiling.
- D6.7c: Forensic Profiling.
- HighTechID.
- Privacy and legal-social content.
- Mobility and Identity.
- Other.
- IDIS Journal.
- FIDIS Interactive.
- Press & Events.
- In-House Journal.
- Booklets
- Identity in a Networked World.
- Identity R/Evolution.
In this section the twofold role which alternative data protection safeguards (see for other suggestions: Dinant, 2008) could play in protecting individuals’ freedoms are presented.
In the first place it will explore what could be done in those cases where the damage has already been done: once the decision has been made on the basis of the profile, the data subject should be protected from harmful consequences through a strict application of the principle of transparency and adequate mechanisms of redress.
In the second place it will present a safeguard for the protection of the freedom of individual citizens before the decision-making takes place: not by due process but by due processing. This would involve an independent board that the processing is done in accordance with the rights of individual citizens: e.g., the integrity of the data and the strict respect of the purpose principle to guarantee the accuracy, accountability and legitimacy of the processing.
24 / 27 |